This may come as a surprise to some, but continued mangling of the
English language annoys me - even more so when I do it myself. One such
example is the over-use of the present continuous when it is more than
sufficient to use the present tense alone. This riles me. This makes me
cringe. This, in fact, makes me tense.
I do not like it; I am definitely not “loving it” - which always
implies to me some sort of lewd encounter with a hamburger reminiscent
of a particular adolescent movie (series) I’ve never seen which mentions
a pie. But I digress.
The present continuous should be used to show, as the name implies,
something occurring now & ongoing. It is far more descriptive than
the present tense, which tends to the factual.
Take, for example “She is a cow” versus “She is being a cow”. The
former leaves no room for error of meaning (regardless of the metaphor’s
appropriateness), whereas the latter excuses ‘her’ actions as being
temporary, perhaps even justified, in a poetic attempt to sympathise
either with ‘her’ or else cows (by suggesting that her inclusion in the
species will have no long term effect on their social standing).
Admittedly, D D Bourland would complain bitterly that all such use of
metaphor breaks the existentialism of “to be”, & is therefore prone
to inaccuracy in most cases, but I think that the directness of the
present tense has become an under-rated conveyor of information &
meaning.
Beyond clarity, there is simplicity. Rather than saying “I am looking
forward to today’s post”, simply “I look forward …” is not a short-hand
that saves two syllables, but removes “to be” entirely! Before the
introduction of the present indicative (“am”), back in the pirate era of
“I be glad to have a parrot for company”, this would have provided
significant clarity. A pirate might also need to be standing on the bow
to say “I am looking forward …”.
I could go on & on like this all day, but I fear I might end up in one of those pirate jokes that end in “Arr”.
No comments:
Post a Comment